NUDITY Sophie Turner Topless - Public Magazine July 2019 - LQ

Public places makes public content period. Enough talking.

 

Since it doesn't appear like higher resolution images are forthcoming at the moment, I took the liberty of running the images through an upscaler/photo enhancer. Hope it's okay to post as 4x upscale since the program can reclaim quite a lot of detail:



The program is Topaz Gigapixel AI if anyone should be wondering.

 

Those looks amazing! (Have you happened to try that program with the Katharine McPhee topless paparazzi pics from a few weeks back?)
Thanks for working on these, they look great!

 

big thanks. I wonder if sophie will get topless in a movie. Jean Grey has great tits.

 

The Katherine McPhee ones are too low quality to yield any interesting result I'm afraid. It works best on photos that have evidently been downscaled (like the Sophie Turner photos), or is already of fairly good quality. But if you want to fiddle around with it yourself I believe the program comes with a free trial.

 

Dude I had no idea she was smoking a joint in the previous version, great job! And thanks!

 

Great job on these Viserys, this looks like an interesting program that could be used to upscale many other pics.

 

Im fine with it as long as the info is tvere that they are upscaled which you have and that the hoster is approved.

 

The quality of this specific photo is insanely good! How did you do it?!

 

Very desirable woman!

 

Fantastic application of this program. I've been on the fence about purchasing a license for this, but the rendering of these pictures are compelling.

 

Longtime lurker here, but I thought I would chime in on this. Topaz can give fantastic results as evidenced in this thread, but far too many people think it can perform magic. What Topaz does is takes an image and attempts to fill in the missing detail using AI learning. As such results can be fantastic if the AI guesses right but can be awful if it guesses wrong. Of course like all learning AI, it gets better the more people use it. But it can't take an image with no detail and make it look like the native RAW output from the camera. It in fact works best with medium quality images that you want to upscale to UHD. Those shots were detail is present but blurry. I will also say that in my experience the program rarely does well with eyes, especially on lower quality images. The fact that she is wearing glasses here is a great boon to this specific instance.

Point is, I will not sit here and say the program doesn't work because it does half of the time or more. Just be realistic in your expectations and understand that the less detail present, the less data the AI has to work with.

 

I too have been curious. Not just for naked ladies reasons. But this convinced me and I just bought it.
its $100. Its not cheap but it wont break the bank either if you have a use for it.

 

There are ways to get it for free you know. Just saying.

 

This was one of the reasons why I was hesitant to give it a try, as I was looking to use it for upscaling family photos and images for work. Looks like the AI is getting better, and hopefully it continues to improve at a quick rate.

Very true. I've purchased other programs at a similar or higher price point, but only those that I have a real need for. This program appears to be useful. I hope you enjoy using it!

I think we're all aware of that. But some users probably are looking at the ease of updates (particularly since this is AI-based), and personally I like supporting programs that really help me out, especially since this fits my budget.

 

what the hell is up with that tabloid magazine to not even post the PICS ON THE COVER in the actual magazine

 

When did she get her nipple pierced?

 

A while ago

 

Thanks for the replay.

Whice version of Topaz were you using?
I've noticed there are a few editions of this software


Thanks again.

 

I am. Its amazing software. I think i will have a lot of use for it. not just for boobs.